Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6529 ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT SOUCIER; LIEUTENANT HEARTLEY; EDWARD THOMAS; ZEB T. HEATH, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:13-ct-03247-BO) Submitted: August 24, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and H
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6529 ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT SOUCIER; LIEUTENANT HEARTLEY; EDWARD THOMAS; ZEB T. HEATH, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:13-ct-03247-BO) Submitted: August 24, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HA..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6529
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT SOUCIER; LIEUTENANT HEARTLEY; EDWARD THOMAS; ZEB
T. HEATH, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03247-BO)
Submitted: August 24, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas, III, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa
N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas, III, appeals the district
court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint and denying his motions to amend and for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thomas’s motions for
appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government
expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Thomas v. Soucier, No. 5:13-ct-03247-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan, 21, 2015;
Mar. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2