Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6754 DAVID MYRON SUIRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. LINO QUILO; KEVIN JOHNSON, P.A.; RN MICHELLE AUTREY; CONMED HEALTHCARE, Defendants – Appellees, and WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; DIRECTOR DOUGLAS C. DEVENYNS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS. Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-02320-JKB) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decid
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6754 DAVID MYRON SUIRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. LINO QUILO; KEVIN JOHNSON, P.A.; RN MICHELLE AUTREY; CONMED HEALTHCARE, Defendants – Appellees, and WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; DIRECTOR DOUGLAS C. DEVENYNS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS. Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-02320-JKB) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decide..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6754
DAVID MYRON SUIRE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. LINO QUILO; KEVIN JOHNSON, P.A.; RN MICHELLE AUTREY;
CONMED HEALTHCARE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; DIRECTOR DOUGLAS C.
DEVENYNS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS.
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02320-JKB)
Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Myron Suire, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Althauser,
ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Myron Suire appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Suire v. Quilo, No. 1:13-cv-02320-JKB (D. Md. April 13,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2