Filed: Sep. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6792 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. GONZALES MARCH, a/k/a Gun, a/k/a Gon, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00590-CMC-6; 3:12-cv-01977-CMC; 3:10-cv-70924-CMC) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affir
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6792 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. GONZALES MARCH, a/k/a Gun, a/k/a Gon, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00590-CMC-6; 3:12-cv-01977-CMC; 3:10-cv-70924-CMC) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirm..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6792
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
GONZALES MARCH, a/k/a Gun, a/k/a Gon,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cr-00590-CMC-6; 3:12-cv-01977-CMC;
3:10-cv-70924-CMC)
Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gonzales March, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D.
Ragsdale, Julius Ness Richardson, John David Rowell, Assistant
United States Attorneys, James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gonzales March appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, after construing it
as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. March, Nos. 3:08-cr-00590-CMC-6;
3:12-cv-01977-CMC; 3:10-cv-70294-CMC (D.S.C. May 7, 2015). We
deny March’s motion to supplement a request for a certificate of
appealability as moot. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2