Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6805 ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRANDY WALKER MCBEE; J. MARK HAYES; DESIREE ALLEN; DONALD ZELENKA; ALAN WILSON; JEAN TOAL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (2:14-cv-02663-RBH) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6805 ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRANDY WALKER MCBEE; J. MARK HAYES; DESIREE ALLEN; DONALD ZELENKA; ALAN WILSON; JEAN TOAL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (2:14-cv-02663-RBH) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6805 ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRANDY WALKER MCBEE; J. MARK HAYES; DESIREE ALLEN; DONALD ZELENKA; ALAN WILSON; JEAN TOAL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (2:14-cv-02663-RBH) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Holland Koon, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Holland Koon appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, as modified, and dismissing without prejudice Koon’s amended civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Koon v. McBee, No. 2:14-cv-02663-RBH (D.S.C. May 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2