Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6909 MARK R. EDWARDS, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. R.A. PERDUE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:14-cv-00136-FPS-JSK) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark R
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6909 MARK R. EDWARDS, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. R.A. PERDUE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:14-cv-00136-FPS-JSK) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark R...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6909
MARK R. EDWARDS, SR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
R.A. PERDUE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:14-cv-00136-FPS-JSK)
Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark R. Edwards, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell
Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark R. Edwards, Sr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
petition as successive under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a) (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Edwards v. Perdue, No. 5:14-cv-00136-FPS-JSK (N.D.W. Va.
May 15, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2