Filed: Oct. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6917 FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, formerly known as Jason Robert Goldader, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEITH EPPS, Fredericksburg Com Reporter (or) Freelancestar.com Reporter; MICHAEL HARIMAN, Prosecutor (of Stafford Circuit Court, VA); JOHN CHAPMAN, Former Patrol Officer of Dumfries P.O., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Se
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6917 FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, formerly known as Jason Robert Goldader, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEITH EPPS, Fredericksburg Com Reporter (or) Freelancestar.com Reporter; MICHAEL HARIMAN, Prosecutor (of Stafford Circuit Court, VA); JOHN CHAPMAN, Former Patrol Officer of Dumfries P.O., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Sen..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6917
FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, formerly known as Jason Robert
Goldader,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEITH EPPS, Fredericksburg Com Reporter (or)
Freelancestar.com Reporter; MICHAEL HARIMAN, Prosecutor (of
Stafford Circuit Court, VA); JOHN CHAPMAN, Former Patrol
Officer of Dumfries P.O.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-01351-JCC-JFA)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frankie Jae LordMaster, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frankie Jae LordMaster appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny LordMaster’s motions for
access of counsel to the original record, for return of the
original record, for consideration of Supreme Court Rule 19, to
stay judgment, to join appeals and parties, and to further
develop facts, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. LordMaster v. Epps, No. 1:14-cv-01351-JCC-JFA
(E.D. Va. May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2