Filed: Sep. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6929 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, v. CLINTON SHAWN MARTIN, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:09-cr-00043-SGW-1) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Shawn
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6929 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, v. CLINTON SHAWN MARTIN, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:09-cr-00043-SGW-1) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Shawn M..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6929
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
v.
CLINTON SHAWN MARTIN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:09-cr-00043-SGW-1)
Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton Shawn Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A.
Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clinton Shawn Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence
reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Martin, No. 5:09-cr-00043-SGW-1
(E.D. Va. filed May 28, 2015, entered May 29, 2015). We grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2