Filed: Oct. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6935 MARCUS ALBINUS JOSEPH, a/k/a Marcus A. Joseph, a/k/a Marcus Albines Joseph, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY M. TURBEVILLE; ANNELLE G. POWELL, Magistrate Judge in Clarendon County; GARY MARTIN; WADE S. KOLB; JOSEPH COKER; SCDC DIRECTOR STIRLING; WARDEN BERNARD MCKIE, of Kirkland Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charlesto
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6935 MARCUS ALBINUS JOSEPH, a/k/a Marcus A. Joseph, a/k/a Marcus Albines Joseph, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY M. TURBEVILLE; ANNELLE G. POWELL, Magistrate Judge in Clarendon County; GARY MARTIN; WADE S. KOLB; JOSEPH COKER; SCDC DIRECTOR STIRLING; WARDEN BERNARD MCKIE, of Kirkland Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6935
MARCUS ALBINUS JOSEPH, a/k/a Marcus A. Joseph, a/k/a Marcus
Albines Joseph,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENRY M. TURBEVILLE; ANNELLE G. POWELL, Magistrate Judge in
Clarendon County; GARY MARTIN; WADE S. KOLB; JOSEPH COKER;
SCDC DIRECTOR STIRLING; WARDEN BERNARD MCKIE, of Kirkland
Correctional Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:15-cv-00412-RMG)
Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus Albinus Joseph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marcus Albinus Joseph appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Joseph v. Turbeville, No. 2:15-cv-00412-
RMG (D.S.C. May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2