Filed: Nov. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7066 JAMES HAIRSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GERALD MCPEAK, Superintendent; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director; MARTY STALLARD, Director of Security, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:15-cv-00274-EKD-RSB) Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015 Amended: November 20, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCA
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7066 JAMES HAIRSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GERALD MCPEAK, Superintendent; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director; MARTY STALLARD, Director of Security, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:15-cv-00274-EKD-RSB) Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015 Amended: November 20, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7066
JAMES HAIRSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GERALD MCPEAK, Superintendent; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director;
MARTY STALLARD, Director of Security,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon,
District Judge. (7:15-cv-00274-EKD-RSB)
Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015
Amended: November 20, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Hairston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Hairston appeals the district court’s orders denying
class certification, separating a jointly filed civil action
into separate civil actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and
dismissing Hairston’s complaint without prejudice for failure to
comply with the court’s prior order to file an affidavit of his
intent to proceed and other documents. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. McPeak,
No. 7:15-cv-00274-EKD-RSB (W.D. Va. June 3, 2015; June 4, 2015;
June 5, 2015; June 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2