Filed: Dec. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7198 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LUIS HERNANDEZ-ESPINOZA, a/k/a Raphael Lopez, a/k/a Rafael Lopez, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (7:09-cr-00112-D-1) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7198 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LUIS HERNANDEZ-ESPINOZA, a/k/a Raphael Lopez, a/k/a Rafael Lopez, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (7:09-cr-00112-D-1) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7198
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LUIS HERNANDEZ-ESPINOZA, a/k/a Raphael Lopez, a/k/a Rafael
Lopez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (7:09-cr-00112-D-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis Hernandez-Espinoza, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Severo, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Luis Hernandez-Espinoza appeals from the district court order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
§ 4B1.1(b) (2009). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2