Filed: Dec. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7227 DARRELL THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. LOCKLEAR, Superintendent; MR. HOLMES, Assistant Superintendent; SGT. SIDBERRY; MS. KEEFER, Psychologist; MS. WHITEHEAD, Psychologist; FRANK L. PERRY, Secretary, NCDPS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:15-ct-03018-F) Submitted: December 15, 20
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7227 DARRELL THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. LOCKLEAR, Superintendent; MR. HOLMES, Assistant Superintendent; SGT. SIDBERRY; MS. KEEFER, Psychologist; MS. WHITEHEAD, Psychologist; FRANK L. PERRY, Secretary, NCDPS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:15-ct-03018-F) Submitted: December 15, 201..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7227
DARRELL THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. LOCKLEAR, Superintendent; MR. HOLMES, Assistant
Superintendent; SGT. SIDBERRY; MS. KEEFER, Psychologist; MS.
WHITEHEAD, Psychologist; FRANK L. PERRY, Secretary, NCDPS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03018-F)
Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 18, 2015
Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darrell Thompson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court. Thompson v. Lockler, No. 5:15-ct-03018-F
(E.D.N.C. June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2