Filed: Dec. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7273 LORENZO RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; WAKE COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03136-BO) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismiss
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7273 LORENZO RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; WAKE COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03136-BO) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismisse..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7273
LORENZO RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; WAKE COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03136-BO)
Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Dominic Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action
for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave
to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Richardson v. Wake Cty. Sheriff’s
Office, No. 5:15-ct-03136-BO (E.D.N.C. July 22, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2