U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 14-7456. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150127151
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Lloyd Anthonie Williams appeals the district court's order denying his "Request for a Certificate of Appealability." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams , Nos. 4:98-cr-00144-MR-1; 1:06-cv-00193-MR (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Lloyd Anthonie Williams appeals the district court's order denying his "Request for a Certificate of Appealability." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams , Nos. 4:98-cr-00144-MR-1; 1:06-cv-00193-MR (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contention..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Lloyd Anthonie Williams appeals the district court's order denying his "Request for a Certificate of Appealability." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, Nos. 4:98-cr-00144-MR-1; 1:06-cv-00193-MR (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
