CHARLES v. DONAHOE, 14-2171. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150319089
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Lydia A. Charles appeals the district court's order denying relief on her complaint alleging that the United States Postal Service discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Charles leave to proceed in forma
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Lydia A. Charles appeals the district court's order denying relief on her complaint alleging that the United States Postal Service discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Charles leave to proceed in forma ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Lydia A. Charles appeals the district court's order denying relief on her complaint alleging that the United States Postal Service discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Charles leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charles v. Donahoe, No. 3:12-cv-00402-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
