THOMAS v. PORCHER, 14-7610. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150406059
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Porcher, No. 1:12-cv-00223-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014). We deny Thomas' motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Porcher, No. 1:12-cv-00223-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014). We deny Thomas' motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument b..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Porcher, No. 1:12-cv-00223-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014). We deny Thomas' motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
