MEJIA v. WAL-MART, 14-2319. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150427060
Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Luis D. Cabrera Mejia appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing Mejia's employment discrimination case with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Mejia v. Wal-Mart , No. 1:14-cv-00237-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Luis D. Cabrera Mejia appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing Mejia's employment discrimination case with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Mejia v. Wal-Mart , No. 1:14-cv-00237-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because t..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Luis D. Cabrera Mejia appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing Mejia's employment discrimination case with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Mejia v. Wal-Mart, No. 1:14-cv-00237-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
