U.S. v. McCASKEY, 13-7761. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150506083
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 06, 2015
Latest Update: May 06, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Dwayne Alex McCaskey appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McCaskey, No. 2:10-cr-00016-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2013); see also United States v. Foote, ___ F.3d ___, 2015 WL 18883538 (4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2015).
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Dwayne Alex McCaskey appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McCaskey, No. 2:10-cr-00016-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2013); see also United States v. Foote, ___ F.3d ___, 2015 WL 18883538 (4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2015). W..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne Alex McCaskey appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McCaskey, No. 2:10-cr-00016-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2013); see also United States v. Foote, ___ F.3d ___, 2015 WL 18883538 (4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
