U.S. v. McCORMICK, 15-6608. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150623144
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Jeffrey Lawson McCormick appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McCormick's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, McCormick has forfeited appellate review of the court's order.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Jeffrey Lawson McCormick appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McCormick's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, McCormick has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Jeffrey Lawson McCormick appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McCormick's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, McCormick has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
