SUTEERACHANON v. McDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC., 15-1130 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150629107
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the district court's orders dismissing her employment discrimination actions and denying her motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Rest. of Md., Inc. , Nos. 8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv-03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-0
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the district court's orders dismissing her employment discrimination actions and denying her motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Rest. of Md., Inc. , Nos. 8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv-03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the district court's orders dismissing her employment discrimination actions and denying her motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Rest. of Md., Inc., Nos. 8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv-03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 24, 2014 & Jan. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
