DAWSON v. BUSH, 15-6325. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150727106
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . William Douglas Dawson, Jr., appeals the district court's judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Douglas v. Bush , No. 4:13-cv-02236-DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . William Douglas Dawson, Jr., appeals the district court's judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Douglas v. Bush , No. 4:13-cv-02236-DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument b..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
William Douglas Dawson, Jr., appeals the district court's judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Douglas v. Bush, No. 4:13-cv-02236-DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
