U.S. v. COLEMAN, 15-6673. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150901104
Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Harold Edward Coleman appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coleman, No. 6:13-cr-00010-NKM-5 (W.D. Va. Apr. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contenti
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Harold Edward Coleman appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coleman, No. 6:13-cr-00010-NKM-5 (W.D. Va. Apr. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Harold Edward Coleman appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coleman, No. 6:13-cr-00010-NKM-5 (W.D. Va. Apr. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
