VILLEGAS v. TAKOMA PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, 15-1544. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20151002145
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : Samuel Villegas, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Villegas v. Takoma Park Police Dep't, No. 8:13-cv-03782-RWT (D. Md. Apr. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and l
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : Samuel Villegas, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Villegas v. Takoma Park Police Dep't, No. 8:13-cv-03782-RWT (D. Md. Apr. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and le..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Villegas, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Villegas v. Takoma Park Police Dep't, No. 8:13-cv-03782-RWT (D. Md. Apr. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
