POTTER v. SUNTRUST BANK, 15-2074. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20151119141
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . D. Sidney Potter appeals the district court's order dismissing this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v), 47(b) for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Potter's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Potter has forfeited appellate review of the court's order
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . D. Sidney Potter appeals the district court's order dismissing this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v), 47(b) for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Potter's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Potter has forfeited appellate review of the court's order...
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
D. Sidney Potter appeals the district court's order dismissing this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v), 47(b) for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Potter's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Potter has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
