HOWARD v. VANCE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., 15-2100. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20151207085
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Emma Victoria Johnson Howard seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss Howard's 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) action in part and to allow certain claims to proceed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Co
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Emma Victoria Johnson Howard seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss Howard's 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) action in part and to allow certain claims to proceed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Coh..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Emma Victoria Johnson Howard seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss Howard's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action in part and to allow certain claims to proceed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Howard seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
