Filed: Feb. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1477 EYVONNE ARTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. FOODS SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-02870-JKB) Submitted: November 30, 2015 Decided: February 9, 2016 Before GREGORY, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eyvonne Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Mary C
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1477 EYVONNE ARTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. FOODS SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-02870-JKB) Submitted: November 30, 2015 Decided: February 9, 2016 Before GREGORY, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eyvonne Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Mary Co..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1477
EYVONNE ARTIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. FOODS SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02870-JKB)
Submitted: November 30, 2015 Decided: February 9, 2016
Before GREGORY, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eyvonne Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Mary Costantino,
Karla Grossenbacher, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eyvonne Artis appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to U.S. Foods Service on her claims under Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Artis v. U.S. Foods Serv., No. 1:13-cv-02870-
JKB (D. Md. Apr. 3, 2015). We deny Artis’ motion to appoint
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court, and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2