Filed: Feb. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1953 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 15-1958 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS; INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT; THE NATIONAL GUARDS; CHIEF OF POLICE, across this nation, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-c
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1953 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 15-1958 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS; INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT; THE NATIONAL GUARDS; CHIEF OF POLICE, across this nation, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-cv..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1953
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 15-1958
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS; INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT;
THE NATIONAL GUARDS; CHIEF OF POLICE, across this nation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00193-BO; 5:15-cv-00326-BO)
Submitted: January 11, 2016 Decided: February 9, 2016
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
these civil actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hurt v. United States, Nos. 5:15-cv-00193-BO;
5:15-cv-00326-BO (E.D.N.C. July 1 & Aug. 11, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3