Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Valery Pouemi v. Commissioner of IRS, 15-2101 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-2101 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2101 VALERY CHOUTOU POUEMI, Petitioner - Appellant, and SANDRINE ATEMEKENG, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 001810-13) Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Valery Choutou Pouemi, Appellant Pro
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2101 VALERY CHOUTOU POUEMI, Petitioner - Appellant, and SANDRINE ATEMEKENG, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 001810-13) Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Valery Choutou Pouemi, Appellant Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Senior Attorney, Julie Ciamporcero Avetta, Francesca Ugolini, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax Division, Washington, D.C.; Mark A. Bond, Susan T. Mosley, Larry R. Pounders, Jr., William J. Wilkins, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Valery Choutou Pouemi appeals the tax court’s order sustaining the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency with respect to Pouemi’s 2009 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Pouemi v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. No. 001810-13 (U.S. Tax Ct. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer