Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Cartwright v. Town of Plymouth, NC, 15-2180 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-2180 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2180 ROBERT CARTWRIGHT; DENISE O. SAWYER, Administratrix of the Estate of Jonathan Sawyer, III, Plaintiffs – Appellants, and JONATHAN SAWYER, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA; KENNETH CREQUE; JOANNE FLOYD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00039-FL) Submitted: March 30,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2180 ROBERT CARTWRIGHT; DENISE O. SAWYER, Administratrix of the Estate of Jonathan Sawyer, III, Plaintiffs – Appellants, and JONATHAN SAWYER, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA; KENNETH CREQUE; JOANNE FLOYD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00039-FL) Submitted: March 30, 2016 Decided: April 29, 2016 Before MOTZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter S. Webster, THE WEBSTER LAW FIRM, Goldsboro, North Carolina, for Appellants. M. Robin Davis, Ann H. Smith, JACKSON LEWIS P.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Cartwright and Denise O. Sawyer appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cartwright v. Town of Plymouth, NC, No. 2:14-cv-00039-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26 & Sept. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer