Filed: Mar. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2288 ZENNA MCCLAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LAKE CITY FITNESS CENTER, f/k/a IH3 Wellness Center; HOPEHEALTH, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:13-cv-03316-BHH) Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2288 ZENNA MCCLAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LAKE CITY FITNESS CENTER, f/k/a IH3 Wellness Center; HOPEHEALTH, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:13-cv-03316-BHH) Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2288 ZENNA MCCLAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LAKE CITY FITNESS CENTER, f/k/a IH3 Wellness Center; HOPEHEALTH, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:13-cv-03316-BHH) Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Zenna McClam, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, KING LOVE & HUPFER, LLC, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Zenna McClam appeals from the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClam v. Lake City Fitness Ctr., No. 4:13-cv- 03316-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2