Filed: Mar. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2397 DAVID ALLEN ABYLA, PhD., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SANDRA K. DALTON, Clerk; FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; SOCIAL SERVICES, Frederick County; DEPARTMENT OF AGING, Frederick County, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:15-cv-02670-GLR) Submitted: February 8, 2016 Decided: March 4, 2016 Before KING and
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2397 DAVID ALLEN ABYLA, PhD., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SANDRA K. DALTON, Clerk; FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; SOCIAL SERVICES, Frederick County; DEPARTMENT OF AGING, Frederick County, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:15-cv-02670-GLR) Submitted: February 8, 2016 Decided: March 4, 2016 Before KING and D..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2397
DAVID ALLEN ABYLA, PhD.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SANDRA K. DALTON, Clerk; FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT;
SOCIAL SERVICES, Frederick County; DEPARTMENT OF AGING,
Frederick County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-02670-GLR)
Submitted: February 8, 2016 Decided: March 4, 2016
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Allen Abyla, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Allen Abyla seeks to appeal the district court’s
order partially dismissing his complaint. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
order Abyla seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Abyla’s
motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2