Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Broadnax Roderick v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr., 15-2438 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-2438 Visitors: 95
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2438 BROADNAX KEITH RODERICK, Dba. Keith Roderick Broadnax; GRAVES RODNEY RYAN, Dba. Rodney Ryan Graves, Petitioners – Appellants, v. LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Magistrate of the State of Maryland; BRIAN E. FROSH, Dba. Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2438 BROADNAX KEITH RODERICK, Dba. Keith Roderick Broadnax; GRAVES RODNEY RYAN, Dba. Rodney Ryan Graves, Petitioners – Appellants, v. LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Magistrate of the State of Maryland; BRIAN E. FROSH, Dba. Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-02805-DKC) Submitted: April 29, 2016 Decided: May 17, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Broadnax Keith Roderick; Graves Rodney Ryan, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Keith Roderick Broadnax and Rodney Ryan Graves appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roderick v. Hogan, No. 8:15-cv-02805-DKC (D. Md. Oct. 13 & Nov. 16, 2015). We deny Appellants’ motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer