Filed: May 05, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2477 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00844-FL) Submitted: April 28, 2016 Decided: May 5, 2016 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Wise; Do
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2477 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00844-FL) Submitted: April 28, 2016 Decided: May 5, 2016 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Wise; Dor..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2477 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00844-FL) Submitted: April 28, 2016 Decided: May 5, 2016 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Wise; Dorothy Monroe-Wise, Appellants Pro Se. Neal Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government in its foreclosure action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wise, No. 5:14-cv- 00844-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2015; Oct. 9, 2015). We deny the pending motion as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
