Filed: Aug. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2501 JIANGUAN CHEN, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: July 13, 2016 Decided: August 9, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Daniel
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2501 JIANGUAN CHEN, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: July 13, 2016 Decided: August 9, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Daniel ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2501
JIANGUAN CHEN,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: July 13, 2016 Decided: August 9, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin C.
Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E.
Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Ashley Martin, Office of
Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jianguan Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic
of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the
immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding
of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript
of Chen’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude
that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any
of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the
Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias,
502 U.S. 478, 481
(1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board. See In re Chen (B.I.A. Nov. 9, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2