Filed: Apr. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2558 ZOUMANA BAKAYOKO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PANERA BREAD, Defendant - Appellee, and JEFF JUDAY; HENNI; KIMBARLLY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta Copeland Biggs, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00993-LCB-LPA) Submitted: April 7, 2016 Decided: April 27, 2016 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2558 ZOUMANA BAKAYOKO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PANERA BREAD, Defendant - Appellee, and JEFF JUDAY; HENNI; KIMBARLLY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta Copeland Biggs, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00993-LCB-LPA) Submitted: April 7, 2016 Decided: April 27, 2016 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2558 ZOUMANA BAKAYOKO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PANERA BREAD, Defendant - Appellee, and JEFF JUDAY; HENNI; KIMBARLLY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta Copeland Biggs, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00993-LCB-LPA) Submitted: April 7, 2016 Decided: April 27, 2016 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Zoumana Bakayoko, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Allen Sar, John Allen Thomas, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Zoumana Bakayoko appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bakayoko v. Panera Bread, No. 1:14-cv- 00993-LCB-LPA (M.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2