Filed: Mar. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6893 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSHUA SAMUEL KNAFEL, a/k/a Joshua S. Knafel, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00015-MFU-RSB-1) Submitted: January 29, 2016 Decided: March 8, 2016 Before KEENAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6893 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSHUA SAMUEL KNAFEL, a/k/a Joshua S. Knafel, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00015-MFU-RSB-1) Submitted: January 29, 2016 Decided: March 8, 2016 Before KEENAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by u..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6893
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOSHUA SAMUEL KNAFEL, a/k/a Joshua S. Knafel,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:12-cr-00015-MFU-RSB-1)
Submitted: January 29, 2016 Decided: March 8, 2016
Before KEENAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry W. Shelton, Federal Public Defender, Christine Madeleine
Lee, Research and Writing Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellant. Anthony P. Giorno, United States Attorney, Jean B.
Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joshua Samuel Knafel appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Knafel, No. 5:12-cr-00015-MFU-
RSB-1 (W.D. Va. May 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2