Filed: Mar. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7595 MUHAMMAD AL-MUJAHIDIN, a/k/a John Hamilton, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANIEL HAROUFF; DANIEL BUSH; D. ARROWOOD; CATHY JONES; MICHAEL MCCALL, In their indiv capacities; SCDC, in its official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (9:14-cv-01266-BHH) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7595 MUHAMMAD AL-MUJAHIDIN, a/k/a John Hamilton, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANIEL HAROUFF; DANIEL BUSH; D. ARROWOOD; CATHY JONES; MICHAEL MCCALL, In their indiv capacities; SCDC, in its official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (9:14-cv-01266-BHH) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 20..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7595
MUHAMMAD AL-MUJAHIDIN, a/k/a John Hamilton,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANIEL HAROUFF; DANIEL BUSH; D. ARROWOOD; CATHY JONES;
MICHAEL MCCALL, In their indiv capacities; SCDC, in its
official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Bruce H. Hendricks, District
Judge. (9:14-cv-01266-BHH)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muhammad Al-Mujahidin, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade,
DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Muhammad Al-Mujahidin seeks to appeal the district court’s
order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Al-Mujahidin seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2