Filed: Apr. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7789 LIONELL ELIJAH EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-04701) Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 28, 2016 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirme
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7789 LIONELL ELIJAH EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-04701) Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 28, 2016 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7789
LIONELL ELIJAH EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-04701)
Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 28, 2016
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lionell Elijah Ephraim, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn,
Assistant United States Attorney, Meredith George Thomas, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lionell Elijah Ephraim appeals the district court’s order
and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ephraim v. Hogsten, No. 1:12-cv-04701 (S.D. W. Va. Oct.
27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2