Filed: Mar. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7815 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTWONNE D. WHITE, Defendant - Appellant. No. 15-8001 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTWONNE D. WHITE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cr-00163-1) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016 Before
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7815 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTWONNE D. WHITE, Defendant - Appellant. No. 15-8001 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTWONNE D. WHITE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cr-00163-1) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016 Before S..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7815
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTWONNE D. WHITE,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 15-8001
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTWONNE D. WHITE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cr-00163-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antwonne D. White, Appellant Pro Se. Monica D. Coleman, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Antwonne D. White appeals the
district court’s orders denying his motion for a reduction of
sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and denying his
motion to reconsider that ruling. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm in both appeals
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
White, No. 2:06-cr-00163-1 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 22, 2015 & Dec. 7,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3