Filed: Apr. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7880 HABEEB ABDUL MALIK, a/k/a Ron Tearia Nicholas, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BEVERLY A. WOODS, Psychiatrist; sued in their personal and official capacity; BRIAN STIRLING, SCDC Director; sued in their personal and official capacity; BERNARD MCKIE, SCDC Warden; sued in their personal and official capacity; ROBERT WARD, Deputy Director; sued in their personal official capacity; JANICE PHILLIPS, Health Care Authority; sued in
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7880 HABEEB ABDUL MALIK, a/k/a Ron Tearia Nicholas, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BEVERLY A. WOODS, Psychiatrist; sued in their personal and official capacity; BRIAN STIRLING, SCDC Director; sued in their personal and official capacity; BERNARD MCKIE, SCDC Warden; sued in their personal and official capacity; ROBERT WARD, Deputy Director; sued in their personal official capacity; JANICE PHILLIPS, Health Care Authority; sued in t..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7880
HABEEB ABDUL MALIK, a/k/a Ron Tearia Nicholas,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BEVERLY A. WOODS, Psychiatrist; sued in their personal and
official capacity; BRIAN STIRLING, SCDC Director; sued in
their personal and official capacity; BERNARD MCKIE, SCDC
Warden; sued in their personal and official capacity; ROBERT
WARD, Deputy Director; sued in their personal official
capacity; JANICE PHILLIPS, Health Care Authority; sued in
their personal and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (5:14-cv-03473-RBH)
Submitted: April 20, 2016 Decided: April 27, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Habeeb Abdul Malik, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann,
DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Habeeb Abdul Malik appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny the pending motion and affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Malik v. Woods, No. 5:14-cv-03473-RBH
(D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2