Filed: Aug. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7914 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHADRIQUEZ DEVON WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (4:09-cr-00039-MFU-RSB-1; 4:13-cv-80576-SGW- RSB) Submitted: August 4, 2016 Decided: August 26, 2016 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curia
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7914 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHADRIQUEZ DEVON WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (4:09-cr-00039-MFU-RSB-1; 4:13-cv-80576-SGW- RSB) Submitted: August 4, 2016 Decided: August 26, 2016 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7914 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHADRIQUEZ DEVON WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (4:09-cr-00039-MFU-RSB-1; 4:13-cv-80576-SGW- RSB) Submitted: August 4, 2016 Decided: August 26, 2016 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chadriquez Devon Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chadriquez Devon Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Chadriquez, Nos. 4:09-cr-00039-MFU-RSB-1; 4:13-cv-80576-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
