Filed: Mar. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7958 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JOEL ADOLFO BORJAS-HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Jose Hernandez Salazar, a/k/a Carlos, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00163-1) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7958 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JOEL ADOLFO BORJAS-HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Jose Hernandez Salazar, a/k/a Carlos, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00163-1) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7958
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JOEL ADOLFO BORJAS-HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Jose Hernandez Salazar,
a/k/a Carlos,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00163-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joel Adolfo Borjas-Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call,
Joshua Clarke Hanks, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Charleston, West Virginia; Richard Gregory McVey, Assistant
United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joel Adolfo Borjas-Hernandez appeals the district court’s
orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion and
denying reconsideration, but extending the appeal period. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Borjas-Hernandez, No. 3:09-cr-00163-1
(S.D.W. Va. Oct. 22 & Dec. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2