Filed: Sep. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1022 JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA), as public servants, individually and in their official capacity as an officer of the court; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (VA), as public servants, individually and in their official capacity as an officer of the court; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA (COA), as public servants, individually and in their official capacity as an officer of the court; GRENADIE
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1022 JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA), as public servants, individually and in their official capacity as an officer of the court; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (VA), as public servants, individually and in their official capacity as an officer of the court; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA (COA), as public servants, individually and in their official capacity as an officer of the court; GRENADIER..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1022
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA), as public servants,
individually and in their official capacity as an officer
of the court; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (VA), as public
servants, individually and in their official capacity as an
officer of the court; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA (COA), as public
servants, individually and in their official capacity as an
officer of the court; GRENADIER STARCE DUFFETT KIESER &
LEVI PC, as public servants, individually and in their
official capacity as an officer of the court;
DIMUROGINSBERG PC, as public servants, individually and in
their official capacity as an officer of the court; MICHAEL
WIESER ESQ., as public servants, individually and in their
official capacity as an officer of the court; REED SMITH,
as public servants, individually and in their official
capacity as an officer of the court; RICH ROSENTHAL
BRINEFIELD MANITTA DZUBIN & KROGER LLP, as public servants,
individually and in their official capacity as an officer
of the court; BWW LAW GROUP, as public servants,
individually and in their official capacity as an officer
of the court; TROUTMAN SANDERS, a/k/a Mays & Valentine, as
public servants, individually and in their official
capacity as an officer of the court; PARKER, SIMON,
KOKOLIS, LLC, as public servants, individually and in their
official capacity as an officer of the court; KELLER
HECKMAN, as public servants, individually and in their
official capacity as an officer of the court; VIRGINIA
STATE BAR, as public servants, individually and in their
official capacity as an officer of the court; NEIL GURVITCH
ESQ., Wecheler, Selzer & Gurvitch, Charted, as public
servants, individually and in their official capacity as an
officer of the court; ILONA GRENADIER HECKMAN, as public
servants, individually and in their official capacity as an
officer of the court; DAVID MARK GRENADIER, as public
servants, individually and in their official capacity as an
officer of the court; ERIKA ELY LEWIS, as public servants,
individually and in their official capacity as an officer
of the court; JOHN DOE, as public servants, individually
and in their official capacity as an officer of the court;
JANE DOE, as public servants, individually and in their
official capacity as an officer of the court,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-01497-GBL-IDD)
Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016
Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Grenadier v. United States, No.
1:15-cv-01497-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3