Filed: Sep. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1112 DANIEL B. CARROLL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. VINNELL ARABIA, LLC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00815-JCC-JFA) Submitted: August 22, 2016 Decided: September 1, 2016 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel B. Carroll, Appel
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1112 DANIEL B. CARROLL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. VINNELL ARABIA, LLC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00815-JCC-JFA) Submitted: August 22, 2016 Decided: September 1, 2016 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel B. Carroll, Appell..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1112
DANIEL B. CARROLL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VINNELL ARABIA, LLC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00815-JCC-JFA)
Submitted: August 22, 2016 Decided: September 1, 2016
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel B. Carroll, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Michael Leland,
KING & SPALDING, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Susan Rebecca Podolsky,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel B. Carroll appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter the district
court’s judgment granting Vinnell Arabia, LLC’s motion to
dismiss his complaint raising claims under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. Carroll v. Vinnell Arabia, LLC,
No. 1:15-cv-00815-JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2