Filed: Jun. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1177 PAULA HANSON-HODGE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00744-LO-TCB) Submitted: June 8, 2016 Decided: June 22, 2016 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1177 PAULA HANSON-HODGE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00744-LO-TCB) Submitted: June 8, 2016 Decided: June 22, 2016 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curia..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1177 PAULA HANSON-HODGE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00744-LO-TCB) Submitted: June 8, 2016 Decided: June 22, 2016 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paula Hanson-Hodge, Appellant Pro Se. R. Joseph Sher, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Paula Hanson-Hodge appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Hodge’s claim of retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hanson-Hodge v. Colvin, No. 1:14-cv-00744-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 21 & Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2