Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1329 IVA ROBBINS; IVAN ROBBINS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00839-AJT-TCB) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1329 IVA ROBBINS; IVAN ROBBINS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00839-AJT-TCB) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1329
IVA ROBBINS; IVAN ROBBINS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00839-AJT-TCB)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Iva Robbins, Ivan Robbins, Appellants Pro Se. David Drake
Hudgins, Amanda Murray Schwartz, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs Iva and Ivan Robbins appeal the district court’s
orders granting the Alexandria Redevelopment and Housing
Authority summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) action, and denying Plaintiffs’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See
Robbins v. Alexandria Redevelopment & Hous. Auth., No. 1:15-cv-
00839-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2016; Mar. 18, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2