Filed: Oct. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1394 CHARLES A. TREECE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01077-NCT-LPA) Submitted: September 30, 2016 Decided: October 25, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by u
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1394 CHARLES A. TREECE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01077-NCT-LPA) Submitted: September 30, 2016 Decided: October 25, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1394
CHARLES A. TREECE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01077-NCT-LPA)
Submitted: September 30, 2016 Decided: October 25, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles A. Treece, Appellant Pro Se. Maija DiDomenico,
Assistant Regional Counsel, Antonia Maria Pfeffer, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Treece appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the
Commissioner’s suspension of Treece’s old-age insurance
benefits. Our review of the Commissioner’s determination is
limited to evaluating whether the findings are supported by
substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied.
See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2012); Johnson v. Barnhart,
434 F.3d
650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005).
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record and
discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. Treece v. Colvin, No. 1:14-cv-01077-
NCT-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2