Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Karen Bass v. Great Eastern Resort, 16-1553 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 16-1553 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1553 KAREN F. BASS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREAT EASTERN RESORT; DAVID CLEVENGER; TIM HINKLE; STEVE NICHOLS, Defendants - Appellees. No. 16-1554 KAREN F. BASS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREAT EASTERN RESORT; DAVID CLEVENGER; TIM HINKLE; STEVE NICHOLS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:16-c
More
                               UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                               No. 16-1553


KAREN F. BASS,

                 Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

GREAT EASTERN    RESORT;   DAVID   CLEVENGER;   TIM   HINKLE;   STEVE
NICHOLS,

                 Defendants - Appellees.



                               No. 16-1554


KAREN F. BASS,

                 Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

GREAT EASTERN    RESORT;   DAVID   CLEVENGER;   TIM   HINKLE;   STEVE
NICHOLS,

                 Defendants - Appellees.



Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00360-TDS-LPA; 1:16-cv-00214-TDS-LPA)


Submitted:   August 30, 2016              Decided:    September 13, 2016


Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Karen F. Bass, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.




                                   2
PER CURIAM:

       Karen F. Bass appeals the district court’s orders accepting

the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing these

civil actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).                  We have

reviewed the records and find no reversible error.               Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.                Bass v.

Great E. Resort, Nos. 1:16-cv-00360-TDS-LPA; 1:16-cv-00214-TDS-

LPA (M.D.N.C., April 19, 2016; May 6, 2016).                 We dispense with

oral   argument   because      the    facts   and   legal    contentions     are

adequately    presented   in    the    materials    before    this   court   and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                      AFFIRMED




                                        3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer