Filed: Sep. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1592 DARRELL P. HARRIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. POLICE NATHAN ULMER, in both his official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department; SERGEANT NATALIE PRESTON, in both her official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department, Defendants – Appellees, and BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Baltim
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1592 DARRELL P. HARRIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. POLICE NATHAN ULMER, in both his official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department; SERGEANT NATALIE PRESTON, in both her official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department, Defendants – Appellees, and BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Baltimo..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1592 DARRELL P. HARRIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. POLICE NATHAN ULMER, in both his official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department; SERGEANT NATALIE PRESTON, in both her official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department, Defendants – Appellees, and BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department; 6 UNKNOWN POLICE & K9 DOG, in both their official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department; MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY; STEPHANIE RAWLINGS-BLAKE, in both their official and individual capacities; GOVERNOR AND THE STATE OF MARYLAND; GOVERNOR MARTIN O’MALLEY, in both his official and individual capacity as Governor, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-02470-JFM) Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016 Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darrell P. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Frederic Nelson Smalkin, Jr., Assistant Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Darrell P. Harris appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment on his civil rights claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as moot Harris’ motion for stay of the district court proceedings pending appeal, deny Appellees’ motion to strike Harris’ motion for stay, and affirm the district court’s order. Harris v. Ulmer, No. 1:14-cv-02470- JFM (D. Md. filed May 6, 2016, entered May 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3