Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1719 CHONG SU YI, And People of Similarly Situated., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:16-cv-01073-TDC) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam op
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1719 CHONG SU YI, And People of Similarly Situated., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:16-cv-01073-TDC) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1719
CHONG SU YI, And People of Similarly Situated.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
(8:16-cv-01073-TDC)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) and denying
his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district
court’s dismissal order to show that it is without prejudice and
affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the district court.
Yi v. Archdiocese of New Orleans, No. 8:16-cv-01073-TDC (D. Md.
Apr. 22 & May 31, 2016); see also Nagy v. FMC Butner,
376 F.3d
252, 258 (4th Cir. 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2