Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1739 STARSHA M. SEWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-00906-DKC) Submitted: October 4, 2016 Decided: October 6, 2016 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha Sewell, Appel
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1739 STARSHA M. SEWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-00906-DKC) Submitted: October 4, 2016 Decided: October 6, 2016 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha Sewell, Appell..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1739 STARSHA M. SEWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-00906-DKC) Submitted: October 4, 2016 Decided: October 6, 2016 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael William Tompkins, FIDELITY NATIONAL LAW GROUP, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil action for failure to state a claim, denying her motion for reconsideration, and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Fidelity Nat’l Inc., No. 8:16-cv- 00906-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2016; May 11, 2016; June 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
